Contact TorqueLedger
Talk through your shop workflow before you switch software.
Use the setup form to ask about Founding 50 access, onboarding, integrations, pricing, or whether TorqueLedger fits your repair shop.
Setup request
Send the shop context and we will map the next step.
Include your current software, payment/accounting tools, staff count, and the workflow problem that is costing the most time.
Before you reach out
What helps us route your TorqueLedger question.
For demo, onboarding, pricing, integration, or Founding 50 questions, include your shop name, number of service advisors, approximate monthly repair order count, current invoicing tool, and whether you need approvals, payments, QuickBooks-ready reporting, or customer reminders first.
Support and setup requests are reviewed around the workflow that is blocking the shop: intake, inspection, estimate approval, invoice review, payment collection, or declined-work follow-up.
Workflow note
How this page fits the shop workflow.
TorqueLedger pages are organized around practical service-counter work: finding the customer, opening the vehicle record, documenting the inspection, explaining the estimate, recording the approval decision, creating the invoice, collecting payment, and queuing the follow-up. That structure helps a small repair shop keep daily work moving without losing owner visibility.
Use this page as one part of the operating map. The related feature, approval, invoice, payment, onboarding, and reporting pages show how each action connects back to the same customer and repair order record.
Shop operating detail
What to check before rollout.
Before a shop changes software, the owner should confirm how the current process handles customer records, vehicle notes, inspection proof, estimate authorization, invoice totals, payment collection, follow-up reminders, and reporting. TorqueLedger is designed so each page explains one piece of that chain and points back to the same operational record.
That gives the team a clearer adoption path: start with the painful workflow, test it with real examples, then expand into adjacent workflows once advisors and owners trust the process.